A WILD NIGHT WITH COUNT TOLSTOY
Even those who haven’t read Tolstoy’s great novel know about the train under which the despairing Anna will die. So it dominates from the start: Philip Breen, adaptor and director , threads the excitement, innovation and terror of Russia’s late-19c railway revolution through this show from the start: some rather wonderful train-whistles blendwith screams, from the whole ensemble, and often poor little Seryozha is seen playing with a toy train often below the stage. Which is at the same time nursery, drawing-rooms, ballroom, country estate and station – its two rocking-horses becoming at one point even the racetrack, where Vronsky flings himself on his damaged horse and Anna flings herself on him in turn.
There’s contrast between Max Jones’ set and Ruth Hall’s costumes – wonderfully, gilded old-Russian bourgeois wealth – and the occasional rapid, disconcerning symbolic mass movement (by Ayse Tashiran) . That’s rather engaging: from mazurka to mayhem in seconds, a lonely light on mother and son, or on Kitty collapsing at her snub by Vronsky, or a sudden emptied space as Karenin and Anna speak their thoughts aside in the dying marriage.
Staging such a dense, multi-character novel doesn’t, at that pace, offer much chance for character to build. Natalie Dormer’s Anna is dignified, preoccupied, suddenly drawn to Seamus Dillane’s dashing soldierly Vronsky; but oddly, it is Tomiwa Edun’s Karenin whose stiff unhappiness and confusion feel more real. Angry Naomi Sheldon and Johnnie Broadbent (nicely reprehensible, laddish) feel more real than the central lovers ever do, and so does Shalisha JAmes-Davis’ kittenish Kitty. David Oakes has the hardest job as Levin, patron saint of anxious overthinkers and the only one of them who, like Tolstoy himself, realizes that all this new technology is going to upset the Russian applecart for good.
By the break – it’s a chunky 3 hrs 10 with interval – my main feeling was that this was a great big Fabergé egg: decorative , evocative, complicated with sharp glittering scene-changes and bursts of gripping Russian chant. An interesting way to make a big novel fit the stage, but oddly unsatisfying (my companion, who claims her romantic weeping history owes it all to the book) felt the same. You can’t make an emotional human omelette out of a Fabergé egg: even Anna’s wild childbed hysteria, shouting for both her Alexeis, doesn’t move the heart. That’s to throw no shade on Dormer, who puts everything into it, it’s just too abrupt.
The mood changes sharply in the second half when, among other things, electricity comes to Russia in the symbolic, surreal and confusing form of a lot of neon tubes pointing down like cage bars. This somehow sends all the couples into ferocious, distraught marital shouting, as if inspired by foreseeing Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf and, indeed, EastEnders. Kitty rants at Levin,, Anna at both Karenin and Vronsky and, in quite my favourite scene, Dolly vents her fury at woman’s lot and being married to poor selfish Stiva, and then carries on doing it alone aboard a cart (smallest rocking-horse recruited) driven by old Petka. He is Les Dennis, what a gem of casting and what a fine beard, and hilariously maintains peasant stoicism as, in Breen’s ultra-free translation, Dolly screams about the “fucking fucking fuck fucking” fate of femaleness.
Tolstoy had a point there, for his time, though Anna herself emerges as always having been a disaster waiting to happen. And altogether, combined with Kitty’s shrill unreasonableness and Anna’s needy demands for the “morphine” of Vronsky’s verbal devotion, empathy disintegrates. The great shining curate’s Fabergé-egg breaks, and there’s nothing to treasure in its velvet heart.
Well, maybe that’s the point. But I can’t deny that Breen keeps our breathless attention all right, for three hours plus,. Even if at times one would have liked a breather, to hang on to a new thought worth keeping.
cft.org.uk to 28 June
rating 3



