Tag Archives: Theatre

A MIDSUMMER NIGHT’S DREAM Bridge Theatre, SE1

DREAM ON!

     Five years on,  beyond Covid lockdowns and its magnificent Guys and Dolls, here again is the Bridge’s irresistible multi-mouse take on Shakespeare’s sunniest comedy of love.   In 2019  I wrote:

  “A  dream of a Dream…one expected fun from the  combination of Nicholas Hytner,  a roiling mass of promenaders in the pit  and a Bunny Christie design making free with the new theatre’s technical tricks. There is nothing rude about the Bridge’s mechanicals:   beds fly and travel,  pits open, platforms appear,  gymnastic fairies  somersault overhead on six sets of aerial silks, and David Moorst’s nicely yobbish-adolescent Puck has one very “Wow!”  exit move”.   

      It’s all still there – Moorst indeed is himself back again, a scornful leather-and tattoos Manc rocker.   I remarked too, and feel it all the movee powerfully now on the far side of five hard years for the youngest aong us,  that this production breathes glorious, exhilarating, club-night  youthfulness.   Not only because it takes advantage of the new wave of cabaret-skilled aerialists , and demands gymnastic agility even from its more senior cast who leap and swing on bedsteads and silks, but by its fearless happiness. There’s a larky sexual fluidity , and a Gen-Z sense of escape from a grey grim adult male  establishment (the Athens opening feelsconventual, soberly  chanting , with Hippolyta captive on glass, unsmiling.  Nor is  the youthfulness  just because of the cheeky ad-lib modernisms from the fleeing lovers and the Rude Mechanicals (who does not melt when Bottom borrows an iphone from the pit crowd to check the moon dates and keeps it for a selfie?}.  

    No, the big rejuvenation lies also in two things which elevate the show to realms of unexpected glee. Hytner  pursues, as most modern interpreters do,   the sense that the forest world, the “fierce vexation of a dream” , releases the humanity of people trapped in the formal stiffness of the court.  That psychological captivity includes Duke  Theseus himself and his unwilling bride Hippolyta the Amazon.  This sense is beautifully evoked, as the dreamworld’s brass bedsteads develop a thicket of leaves and flowers and the four young lovers leap and romp between them and finally,  sweetly, awake confused , four in a bed which was once a grassy bank,  looking up with real foreboding at stern Theseus in hunting-gear,  wakened from his Oberon dream. 

       And  the other thing that had us whooping both five years ago and now,  even up in the gallery (I chickened out of the pit as usual).    Hytner decided to “reassign” some 300 key lines,  so that it is not Titania who is conned and bewitched in their quarrel over a changeling child, but Oberon.  Apart from a sneaky feminist thrill,  it just happens to be FUNNIER to have a man conned into bed with a monster than when it happens to a woman (as in real life, er, it often does).  JJ Feild is a stern Oberon beautifully humbled by his delusion, and Susanna Fielding  queenly, lively, likeable Titania,  later as Hippolyta giving her man a knowing glance, reminding him that he has been a ridiculous twerking dupe in a thong alongside Bottom.   Who, this time, is a very entertaining Emmanuel Akwafo, camp as ninepence in his preening yet oddly,  briefly,  suddenly and unexpectely touching at the moment when he realizes someone at last  really fancies him. The look he gives Oberon in that delighted moment is memorable days later.  

     And I had forgotten how funny is the brief late scene when Theseus has to decide which of the proffered entertainments to watch.  Even the fag-smoking, balloon-popping “tipsy muses” are not as funny as the literary chap in a jacket representing “The thrice-three Muses mourning for the death of learning” even though it lasts only seconds…  

    Perfect. All the silliness and solemnity, on a grand night out.  And a celebration of this theatre – all theatres – which survived the pandemic lockdown disaster to let us breathe,  laugh and cheer again, hugger-mugger fearless.   

Bridgetheatre.co.uk to 20 august

rating  5 

Comments Off on A MIDSUMMER NIGHT’S DREAM Bridge Theatre, SE1

Filed under Theatre

THE YEARS. Harold Pinter Theatre WC2

A FEMALE EVOLUTION, FRANK AND FINE


First salute the cast: Deborah Findlay, Romola Garai, Gina McKee, Anjli Mohindra
and Harmony Rose-Bremner, for an unpretentiously powerful tour de force. Each is
required in turn to narrate, to take the centre and become a supporting act, and to
evoking ages from infancy to the seventh decade with wit, deftness and feeling. Five
wonderful performances, shading from profundity to comedy, make Eline Arbo’s
play of Annie Ernaux’ memoir deserve the raves it got at the Almeida.
Full disclosure: I am going to be unwontedly personal. Because The Years
evokes my period, less a decade: it shows a woman going through life from a 1940s
childhood to our own century. Its narration reminds us of world events , inventions
and trends (reminiscent of that endearing Harry Beck play, https://theatrecat.com/
2024/11/12/the-truth-about-harry-beck-london-transport-museum/) . And having
been born exactly ten years after Ernaux I felt its truth like an elder sister’s story.
Especially as it is set in France, where I was a pre-teen for four years singing the
same hymns as the schoolgirl stage selves, as devoted to Piaf as they were, and
responding to the same crises (Algeria: walking home from school in Lille I saw a
man shot in the street).
So the convent childhood and the postwar and Cold War chat rang eerily true.
The adolescent yearnings and sexual curiosity are every girl’s (though I was not as
heroic a masturbator as evoked by Mohindra). And while I escaped the worst,
equally recognizable is her pitiful confused surrender of virginity to a lout: at one
point in the oaf’s bedroom knowing she could leave but saying “I have no right to
abandon this man in the state he’s in”. Ah yes: even ten years later we girls were
being fed the legend that an aroused boy would be somehow dangerously damaged if
you didnt let him complete the job.
It is a female life story both playful and rueful, honest and sometimes self
mocking: when these ‘60s girls, barely adult though they are graduates, felt it vital
to be in a couple and soon home with a baby, their chatter about having found this
desired happiness is tinged with an edge of doubt (this is what we wanted, what
have we done, will that book we dreamed of ever get written?). Perfect: so is the
sudden liberation of 1968 and then the hippie days, jolting them out into rebellion and
feminism. Again, having the luck to still be only a teenager when things changed I
had watched these young matrons suddenly feeling their wings, envying us their
unburdened little sisters.
Family life chaos follows, then the having-in-all working-mother exhaustion
and the vertigo of suddenly realizing as the middle generation that you are in charge,
children dependent, parents old and frail. It’s all set in a series of photographs,
wittily posed in front of sheets and I love the Mum-on-Holiday one , in an
unflattering dress and evoking “fatigue, and the absence of a desire to please”. But
then comes divorce, regret, children becoming adult, time-wasting obsession with a
new lover (who goes back to his wife), a dalliance with far younger men. And behind
it that middle-aged amazement at suddenly no longer being the hub of a great wheel
of family, but alone…
I should mention the abortion scene, a talking point after some audience, mainly
apparently male, fainted in the Almeida. In fact Garai’s evocation of miscarriage
after a brutal backstreet abortion is done as it should be, with elegant brutality and
deep sadness. But someone who clearly can’t read trigger warnings, reviews or
theatre news did bring the show to a halt on press night, having to be ushered out
while the cast stood calm behind a lone stage manager (male, poor devil, doing his
announcement with the bloodstained sheet still on the table). Then as the tale moved
on, and the women became a row of young mothers discussing babysitters and
cooking for the in-laws, another ticketed weakling forced a second break. Which
culminated I am happy to say in a round of applause and cheers for patient cast and
put-upon SM. Curious, though, in an age where you can hardly spend a week of
classic theatre without someone booting a bloodstained polystyrene head around the
stage.
And it was undeserved. Because this was a beautiful and honest piece of theatre,
ripe with pity and laughter, exaggerating and exploiting nothing. I wish them all
many shows with less triggering.


haroldpintertheatre.co.uk. to 12 April

Comments Off on THE YEARS. Harold Pinter Theatre WC2

Filed under Theatre

THE TRUTH ABOUT HARRY BECK                London Transport Museum 

 

A JOURNEY OF JOURNEYS

     A map is a lovely thing, but sometimes practically speaking a diagram is better. And can also be lovely: especially when its useful elegance has become a familiar part of home.   Such is the London Underground diagram:  designed initially by Harry Beck (who preferred to be called Henry),  for a time appearing under another name to his great chagrin, but now once more honouring him with a tiny inscription at the bottom:  “After an idea by Harry C Beck”. 

    The story of its creation is being  told in this playful, touching 65-minute play  in the tiny Cubic Theatre underneath the London Transport Museum:  as one player says, “the twisting story of a simple thing”. 

 Happening to be in Covent Garden on a Sunday,  I wandered into the roiling mass of confused tourists ,  since I note that it has extended to January with  well-earned plaudits for the Natural Theatre Company’s wistful nostalgic take on the story. 

       Simon Snashall from The IT Crowd on TV normally takes the part, but on my day he was replaced by John Gregor, and I cannot imagine any more charming depiction:  in a tank top, balding and bespectacled,  he delicately draws the portrait of one of the Great British Nerds,  a decent unassuming man focused more on his work than his image.   Alongside him Ashley Christmas plays his wife and chief narrator,  Nora (admitting she had to do the proposing). 

        Andy Burden’s neat script (he also directs)  takes  their story from Beck’s unassuming beginnings, anxious for work in the hungry 1930’s, through courtship and marriage to retirement, all in retrospect.  It happens on  the sweetest of sets: draughtsmans desk, ,hatstand  armchair, teapot, a screen behind suggesting the ghostly fact of the winding London Thames.  He was first an draughtsman apprentice in the Signals department of London transport,  drawing electronics diagrams all straight lines and connections.   “He likes patterns”  says Nora,  and Beck had always shaking his head at the way that once they’re actually built, electrical systems end  up as a jumble of wire  spaghetti.

       He moved on to draw some Underground posters – classics every one, on sale upstairs on a dozen mugs and T-shirts.   And between them, he and Nora  saw that while people  at work may go from A to B on a familiar line,  some also want to roam around the great city and see new places. They need to know how to change line.  But as the system of lines had grown fast, built by different companies,  the map became a terrible mess (worth looking that up, here’s a nice one https://www.alteagallery.com/products/london/london-transport-maps/a-pre-beck-map-of-londons-underground-railways/). 

        So ,  grabbing a red ribbon from Nora’s sewing-basket to make the Central Line,  Beck picked up next a purple one, a green one, a  blue one, a black one…pinning them from lamp-stand to wall to floor in a maypole jungle, getting an audience member to hold down the end of the Northern Line with his foot . And he  began clothespegging the junctions together.  And settled down to draw it in neat lines. 

        In 1933, only mildly impressed, London Transport agreed to put it out on a series of little portable maps. And people, of course, loved it.

        The story of his revisions, obsession, and arguments carries on, economically done (“ooh – top left – a bit spiky – smooth it out..”)  Nora’s narrative neatly points out how the years fled by, invention by invention – cats eyes, nylon, spam, aerosols, helicopters, dialysis –  while Harry revised and revised and re-designed. 

       And then furiously found that his old verbal contract wasn’t waterproof..and it came out a bit vandalized by someone called Hutchinson.  And Nora had to calm him down.  But he’s there on the credits now, and celebrated in the little theatre.  Like his diagram,  it’s a neat and elegant delight.

ltmuseum.co.uk     to 5 jan   

rating 4      

Comments Off on THE TRUTH ABOUT HARRY BECK                London Transport Museum 

Filed under Theatre

LAUGHING BOY Jermyn St Theatre

A BOY BETRAYED

Connor was 18 when he drowned in the bath with an epileptic seizure.  It needn’t have happened. He was under slipshod care, away from the family who loved him, in an NHS “Assessment and Treatment Unit” where he was neither competently assessed nor treated with care.  There have been scandals about such units  for people with autism and learning disabilities,  but this case was made famous by the protests and the persistence of his mother , Sara Ryan.  She used social media:  blogged, publicly accused and reviled the institution , grew a broad wide protest movement and fuelled a damning inquiry into the Slade centre (now closed). She finally got an Article 2 Inquest with jury,  which despite the efforts of Southern Health and their lawyers returned unanimous verdicts: serious failings, poor systems, care , risk management, staff inadequately trained , failures of communication.  

        Her book, “Justice for Laughing Boy” detailed Connor’s life, quirks and problems, leading to his placing in Slade for the final 107 days of his life.  The director  Stephen Unwin is himself parent of a son with learning disabilities, and already a passionate campaigner (his chilling history play about Nazi attitudes was powerful here in2017 (https://theatrecat.com/2017/05/09/all-our-children-jermyn-st-theatre/).  He followed her case, and made this adaptation . 

So it’s a campaigning play about a campaign: with Janie Dee as Sara giving a remarkable performance at its centre.   At every stage and level she shines with hard truth.  In the playful opening of family life his quirks, difficulties, delights and obsession with buses are absorbed with humour by the mother, longtime partner Richard and four siblings.  Alfie Friedman (himself autistic)  expresses the endearing strangeness of Connor’s perception and the erratic behaviour his family came to understand and love. Friedman’s closeness with Dee is touchingly expressed, and after his death she has ‘conversations’ with him – the boy is always there, on stage as a presence, until the very end.   Dee herself handles every nuance of Sara in her struggle for justice and recognition of how it happened :  she moves between humour, shock, grief, indignation and ferocious mother-tiger persistence.  And in the moment when at 18 suddenly Connor, six feet tall and powerful,   has bursts of dangerous aggression and assaults even her, the sense of a family living with both love and fearful uncertainty is properly unnerving.   

           Alongside Dee, and Forbes Masson as Richard,  the four surviving siblings help to tell the story;  speaking as themselves or quoting the doctors, support workers, nurses, officials and finally lawyers on both sides at the inquest, plus a not very helpful health minister Jeremy Hunt.  Good projections support the mood and story. The result, at 100 minutes straight, is always gripping and certainly informative:  it expresses both the rewards and the difficulties that occur when an endearing child becomes a strong adult. The transition into NHS adult care of an individual still deeply childlike is something families rightly dread. We witness how commonsense can clash with a careful legal culture of adult rights .  Connor, for instance, hated his epilepsy and therefore denied he had it: this meant the Unit, opting to believe him rather than his mother, did not properly supervise this young adult’s bathing. They later denied the epilepsy existed: horrid post-mortems had to prove it. The lad was also technically free to leave, not confined, which created a legal difference, but as Sara pointed out he wouldn’t have left the unit alone: she knew him, he did not go around alone. Issues also surrounded her relationship, increasingly hostile online an in person, with NHS and unit personnel. Certainly she deserves a plinth in the glorious pantheon of Difficult Women: she had to .

       So you watch, learn, and reflect. But one thing which could have been avoided is that in the white heat of author’s and director’s fury, each of the unhelpful or obstructive official voices  – played by the sibling group – conveys an exaggeratedly satirical tone: studiedly nasty, scornful voices. But   the facts and words themselves are damning enough, and this cartoonish overload jars, gets in the way, even at times making you briefly want to hear the other side.     Sara Ryan was right to want answers, exposed a lot of real neglect and institutional failure, and played with brilliant truthfulness by Janie Dee as she goes through grief, shock, outrage, weariness and dry appalled academic distaste for their excuses. Forbes Masson’s Richard has an angry decency.   But at times the relentless tone of scorn makes you want a wider frame for the story: not least an illustration that how such disabilities can and sometimes are better helped . And that unease is a shame. Because, in every detail, Connor’s treatment was a downright disgrace. 

jermynstreetheatre.co.uk to 31 May

Comments Off on LAUGHING BOY Jermyn St Theatre

Filed under Theatre